PATCH/RFC [0/3]: Fix suspend and other acceleromter issues

[Werner Almesberger]

Andy Green wrote:
> The "without interrupts" bit is the point.

Ah, I misunderstood then, sorry. I thought you meant to suggest the
use of interrupts for asynchronous operation - just the opposite of
what we have now with bitbang-all-the way.

Yes, that makes sense as long as the bit-banging doesn't take too
much time. (How much time does this interrupt handler actually take ?)

- Werner