preparing pcf50633 for upstream

[Michael 'Mickey' Lauer]

Am Donnerstag, den 02.10.2008, 09:25 -0300 schrieb Werner Almesberger:
> Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> > ...if someone writes a battery class driver for GTA01.
> 
> So if we remove the APM code from the the driver destined for upstream,
> then there will be the following possibilities:
> 
> - we get a battery class driver done for GTA01 in time to submit along
>   with the PCF50633 changes, so everything comes back at the same time
>   from upstream,
> 
> - we get that battery class driver for GTA01 done by the time the
>   PCF50633 changes come back, so it would be an OM-local patch until
>   the next iteration, or
> 
> - if all else fails, we can just put the APM emulation calls back as
>   an OM-local patch when the PCF50633 changes come back, and remove
>   them when we're ready to use the battery class for everything.
> 
> Does this sound good ? My hunch is that we'll probably end up with the
> middle choice, which doesn't seem too bad.

Sounds pretty good to me.

:M: