new kernel developer and preparation for upstream merge
Nelson Castillo
nelsoneci at gmail.com
Tue Oct 14 11:24:08 CEST 2008
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Andy Green <andy at openmoko.com> wrote:
(cut)
> I think you will have more fun and progress picking a small driver from
> our tree and going through doing what is needed to improve it.
>
> If you check out the stable-tracking tree and do the Big Diff
>
> git clone git://git.openmoko.org/git/kernel.git linux-2.6
> git diff origin/master origin/stable-tracking >om-tracking.patch
> grep ^+++\ om-tracking.patch
>
> you can get an idea of everything we are carrying locally and find stuff
> that interests you that way.
Hello Andy.
I started checking the sources and I have a cleanup patch for
drivers/leds/leds-neo1973-vibrator.c.
Is the stable-tracking tree supposed to compile? (perhaps part of our
task is make it compile). I had issues with pwm.h. It seems it moved
to include/linux. I guess it has to do with the recent Linux release.
I guess I should send patches against stable-tracking after testing
that they compile (if they're cleanup patches).
Should I use another tree temporally?
What should I do?
BTW, a remark is wrong:
diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
index 3945f80..7c77575 100644
--- a/include/linux/pwm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
@@ -28,4 +28,4 @@ int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm);
*/
void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm);
-#endif /* __ASM_ARCH_PWM_H */
+#endif /* __LINUX_PWM_H */
Regards,
Nelson.-
PS: Using gmail now. I will configure mutt later for this account.
Patch might break.
More information about the openmoko-kernel
mailing list