Om2009 testing Release 2

[Angus Ainslie]

On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 21:17 +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
> 
> Right now, I'm thinking that _only_ fso got updated, and the
> kernel/drivers are all the same. Alternatively, kernel drivers _were_
> updated and those changes are reflected in both the fso images (it is a
> rootfs with a /lib/modules/*, after all) and the stand-alone,
> use-with-homegrown-rootfs modules file. Which one's correct?
> 

fso, the feeds and the rootfs had some updates but most of the updates
were to paroli. There have been kernel updates as well but there are a
few bugs I don't want to bring in yet. To keep it stable I have opted to
continue using an older kernel. This is not to minimize the work Nelson
has been doing in the kernel, he will recommend a new kernel soon.
  
Angus