FSO testing on Neo 1973 - todays upgrade

Torfinn Ingolfsen tingox at gmail.com
Sun Aug 31 15:13:54 CEST 2008


Hello,

I am still running FSO testing on my Neo 1973.

When trying to do an upgrade today, I see this: (first I did the 'opkg update'):
root at om-gta01:~# opkg -test upgrade
Upgrading angstrom-version on root from 1:-20080826-r1 to 1:-20080831-r1...
Downloading http://shr.bearstech.com/fso-testing/ipk/om-gta01/angstrom-version_-20080831-r1_om-gta01.ipk
Upgrading e-wm on root from 0.16.999.042+cvs20080802-r9 to
0.16.999.043+svnr35592-r11...
Downloading http://shr.bearstech.com/fso-testing/ipk/armv4t/e-wm_0.16.999.043+svnr35592-r11_armv4t.ipk
Installing libefreet0 (1:0.5.0.043+svnr35592-r1) to root...
Downloading http://shr.bearstech.com/fso-testing/ipk/armv4t/libefreet0_0.5.0.043+svnr35592-r1_armv4t.ipk
Upgrading gst-meta-audio on root from 0.10-r10 to 0.10-r11...
Downloading http://shr.bearstech.com/fso-testing/ipk/armv4t/gst-meta-audio_0.10-r11_armv4t.ipk
Installing gst-plugin-wavparse (0.10.7-r2) to root...
Downloading http://shr.bearstech.com/fso-testing/ipk/armv4t/gst-plugin-wavparse_0.10.7-r2_armv4t.ipk
Upgrading gst-meta-base on root from 0.10-r10 to 0.10-r11...
Downloading http://shr.bearstech.com/fso-testing/ipk/armv4t/gst-meta-base_0.10-r11_armv4t.ipk
gst-meta-base: unsatisfied recommendation for gst-plugin-gnomevfs
Upgrading illume on root from 0.0+svnr170-r11 to 0.0+svnr35605-r13...
Downloading http://shr.bearstech.com/fso-testing/ipk/armv4t/illume_0.0+svnr35605-r13_armv4t.ipk
Installing libefreet0 (1:0.5.0.043+svnr35592-r1) to root...
Downloading http://shr.bearstech.com/fso-testing/ipk/armv4t/libefreet0_0.5.0.043+svnr35592-r1_armv4t.ipk
Upgrading libcairo2 on root from 1.6.4-r1 to 1.6.4-r3...
Downloading http://shr.bearstech.com/fso-testing/ipk/armv4t/libcairo2_1.6.4-r3_armv4t.ipk
Upgrading libefreet-mime0 on root from 1:0.5.0.043+cvs20080802-r0 to
1:0.5.0.043+svnr35592-r1...
Downloading http://shr.bearstech.com/fso-testing/ipk/armv4t/libefreet-mime0_0.5.0.043+svnr35592-r1_armv4t.ipk
Installing libefreet0 (1:0.5.0.043+svnr35592-r1) to root...
Downloading http://shr.bearstech.com/fso-testing/ipk/armv4t/libefreet0_0.5.0.043+svnr35592-r1_armv4t.ipk
Upgrading libsdl-1.2-0 on root from 1.2.9-r6 to 1.2.11-r6...
Downloading http://shr.bearstech.com/fso-testing/ipk/armv4t/libsdl-1.2-0_1.2.11-r6_armv4t.ipk
Upgrading ppp on root from 2.4.3-r3 to 2.4.3-r4...
Downloading http://shr.bearstech.com/fso-testing/ipk/armv4t/ppp_2.4.3-r4_armv4t.ipk
Collected errors:
 * Package libefreet0 wants to install file /usr/lib/libefreet.so.0
        But that file is already provided by package  * efreet
 * Package libefreet0 wants to install file /usr/lib/libefreet.so.0.5.0
        But that file is already provided by package  * efreet
 * Package libefreet0 wants to install file /usr/lib/libefreet.so.0
        But that file is already provided by package  * efreet
 * Package libefreet0 wants to install file /usr/lib/libefreet.so.0.5.0
        But that file is already provided by package  * efreet
 * Package libefreet0 wants to install file /usr/lib/libefreet.so.0
        But that file is already provided by package  * efreet
 * Package libefreet0 wants to install file /usr/lib/libefreet.so.0.5.0
        But that file is already provided by package  * efreet

I have been brnt by opkg updates often enough to always do a 'opkg
-test upgrade' first, so that I can try to see how things might break.
Two questions:

1) is the message "gst-meta-base: unsatisfied recommendation for
gst-plugin-gnomevfs" fatal? What will break?
2) What is the correct way to fix the efreet /libefreet0 mixup?
-- 
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen




More information about the community mailing list