UCLK

[Werner Almesberger]

Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
> Not incorrectly, just following table 1-1 (the whole pinout was probably  
> copied from there or from a nearby table).

Ah yes, the inconsistency is Samsung's. Normally, they call it
UEXTCLK, except at this one place.

> So far, nobody (except perhaps Joerg) seems to have checked the routing  
> and possible issues with having a 48MHz signal there.

Yup, but we can't really help him with the layout ... and all the
other aspects look good.

- Werner